CORDIAL MINUET ENSEMBLE

Appears to be working great!

hehe

INCIDENT.... CLEMENCY. You'll remember that name.

I remember the first TCD video where you were all chipper, then the next one with robot-Jason because people were disturbed by the first one. Then this last CM intro video is great, but I swear the tone sounds like you're explaining to a small child. So yea, it doesn't seem worth the hassle. I did hear some subtle voice work in there, but couldn't make out what was being said....

When you first deposited money into the game, you should have received an email telling you your "alias."

Got another feature for ya. Type the following for a profit graph of your chosen player:

@canto_delirium profit creature expression

This will be your profit history ranging from the inception of the bot (1/18/15) to now.

The x-axis is scaled by the games you played; it's not scaled by time. So I'm not sure if date labels would help or not. We'll see.

Cool, thank you! I was struggling to understand why I was having such a hard time advocating for this change. I didn't realize it was because I was using unheard of techniques. Oh well, a gif's worth a thousand words.

I wonder how many people were already doing this. Maybe I've shared too much, but at least I have more content for Creature Expression's Pro Tips Volume II!

Maybe it's the terminology getting in the way. What you're describing is what I call 1st turn betting

*sigh*

I'm not asking for a faster way to do it.

I'm asking for the option to do it during the 2nd turn betting.

If you're settled here, just stop me. But I think I get the confusion.

I don't want a full column preview. I don't want to see in total what my 4 possible scores are for a given column. I do want to check all 8 remaining numbers individually.

The reason is because the 4 numbers in a given column might each, when reviewed individually, give me the actual highest score in those 4 cases. I don't get that information from the full column preview because I don't see the relationships the same way (i.e. oh, I get THIS score and my opponent can't have THAT score).

The only reason I would want to "drag the sliders" is because that's how I currently access the information I'm describing (in conjunction with a hover).

The difference between what I'm suggesting and what we currently have is the difference between knowing you have a guaranteed win and being clueless to that fact on the 2nd turn bet.

Maybe you thought I was saying the full column preview shows four scores that are ALL above the red scores, but that's not it. Sorry if I was unclear.

I didn't quite follow this. I don't see a difference between "mousing over uncolored squares as if they were green" and "full column preview" in the last round. If I pick a green square, we know the other column would be red.... maybe I'm missing something.

But anyway, if you were to pick up Cobblestone's suggestion, it's a moot point and I'm all for it!

I realize that you've got a lot of design constraints here, but I still think this is pretty important. jgw has mentioned the reason he's playing around with compilation is so he can make improvements to the UI (presumably things such as this proposal). It'd be nice if modders couldn't easily extract such a huge advantage.

When I first wrote it, I was checking for one person losing money and the other gaining in the same time period. Then I realized both players could lose money and there still be a "winner", so I threw the checks away. But I need to add back in the one for the loser having negative profit.

Yea I agree with your suggestion. Until that comes out though, maybe this will help you:

You have played 28 games. In the last 10 days, I have played the same number and here are the people with the most games played in that period:

304    clock form
234    jeopardy alcohol
141    prayer hint
123    violation disease
123    examination kerchief
114    inhabitant obsession

from photos posted on Twitter: